5. SINIF FEN BİLİMLERİ DERSİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN TERS YÜZ SINIF MODELİNE YÖNELİK GÖRÜŞLERİ

Hüseyin Cihan BOZDAĞ, Suat TÜRKOĞUZ

Abstract


OPINIONS OF 5TH GRADE SCIENCE COURSE STUDENTS ON FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL

In this study, it is aimed to determine the opinions of 5th grade students about Science course (SC) based on the Flipped Classroom Model (FCM). In the conducted study, case study design which is one of the qualitative research approach was adopted. The study group consists of 25 volunteer students selected from by the purposeful sampling method Purposeful sampling method which is one of the non-random sampling types. Edpuzzle training platform has been used in FCM to access interactive video lessons. Semi-structured open-ended questions in the form of videos were asked online to determine the opinions of the students who experienced the SC based on FCM. When the qualitative data obtained were evaluated together, it was found that FCM is an entertaining and interesting educational application that helps students to learn, increases their interest in the course, provides effective use of technology. In order to visualize the views of the participating students experiencing FCM, the model of effects of FCM applications from the eyes of students (MEFES) was developed in line with the data obtained by the researcher.

Keywords: Edpuzzle, flipped classroom model, opinions of students, science course.

Öz

Bu çalışmada 5. Sınıf öğrencilerinin Ters Yüz Sınıf Modeline (TYSM) dayalı Fen Bilimleri dersine ilişkin görüşlerini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Yürütülen çalışmada nitel araştırma yaklaşımından durum çalışması deseni benimsenmiştir. Çalışma grubunu seçkisiz olmayan örnekleme türlerinden amaçsal örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen gönüllü 25 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. TYSM’nde etkileşimli video derslerinin erişimine yönelik olarak Edpuzzle eğitim platformu kullanılmıştır. TYSM’ne dayalı işlenen fen bilimleri dersini tecrübe eden öğrencilerin görüşlerini belirlemek için çevrimiçi ortamda video halinde yarı yapılandırılmış açık uçlu sorular yöneltilmiştir. Elde edilen nitel veriler bir arada değerlendirildiğinde TYSM’nin öğrencilerin öğrenmelerine yardımcı olan, derse ilgilerini arttıran, teknolojiyi etkin kullanımı sağlayan, eğlenceli ve ilgi çekici bir eğitim uygulaması olduğu yönünde bulgulara ulaşılmıştır. TYSM’ni deneyimleyen katılımcı öğrencilerin görüşlerini görselleştirerek daha belirgin hale getirmek amacıyla araştırmacılar tarafından elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda TYSM uygulamalarının öğrenci gözünden etkileri modeli (TÖGEM) geliştirilmiştir.

Anahtar Terimler: Edpuzzle, fen bilimleri, öğrenci görüşü, ters yüz sınıf modeli.

KAYNAKLAR

Abeysekera, L. & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research ve Development, 34(1), 1–14.

Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers ve Education126, 334-345.

Akgün, M., & Atıcı, B. (2017). Ters-düz sınıfların öğrencilerin akademik başarısı ve görüşlerine etkisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi25(1), 329-344.

Al‐Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students' creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology46(6), 1133-1148.

Allan, B. (2007). Blended learning: Tools for teaching and training. Facet Publishing.

Alper, A., & Öztürk, S. (2019). Programlama öğretimindeki ters-yüz öğretim yönteminin öğrencilerin başarılarına, bilgisayara yönelik tutumuna ve kendi kendine öğrenme düzeylerine etkisi. Bilim Eğitim Sanat ve Teknoloji Dergisi3(1), 13-26.

Altemueller, L., & Lindquist, C. (2017). Flipped classroom instruction for inclusive learning. British Journal of Special Education44(3), 341-358.

Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers ve Education128, 269-283.

Baker, J. W. (2000). The" classroom flip. Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side.

Baker, J. W. (2016). The origins of “the classroom flip.”. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Higher Education Flipped Learning Conference, Greeley, Colorado.

Bates, J. E., Almekdash, H., & Gilchrest-Dunnam, M. J. (2017). The flipped classroom: A brief, brief history. In The Flipped College Classroom (pp. 3-10). Springer, Cham.

Bell, M. R. (2015). An investigation of the impact of a flipped classroom instructional approach on high school students' content knowledge and attitudes toward the learning environment. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. School of Technology. Brigham Young University

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education.

Bergmann, J., Overmyer, J., & Wilie, B. (2012). The Flipped Class: Myths vs. Reality (1 of 3). The Daily Riff- Be Smarter. About Education. http://www.thedailyriff.com/articles/the-flipped-class-conversation-689.php adresinden 26.08.2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C. N., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Journal of Educational Technology ve Society19(3), 134-142.

Bishop, J. L., ve Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE national conference proceedings, Atlanta, GA (Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1-18).

Blair, E., Maharaj, C., & Primus, S. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies21(6), 1465-1482.

Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley ve Sons.

Boyraz, S., & Ocak, G. (2017). Implementation of flipped education into Turkish EFL teaching context. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi13(2), 426-439.

Brame, C. J. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/ adresinden 15.08.2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Brooks, A. W. (2014). Information literacy and the flipped classroom: Examining the impact of a one-shot flipped class on student learning and perceptions. Communications in Information Literacy8(2).

Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education ve Accreditation6(1), 33.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Örnekleme yöntemleri.  w3. balikesir. edu. tr. adresinden 06.09.2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Ceylaner, S. G., & Karakus, F. (2018). Effects of the flipped classroom model on students' self-directed learning readiness and attitudes towards the english course. English Language Teaching11(9), 129-143.

Chao, C. Y., Chen, Y. T., & Chuang, K. Y. (2015). Exploring students’ learning attitude and achievement in flipped learning supported computer aided design curriculum: A study in high school engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(4), 514–526.

Chen, K. S., Monrouxe, L., Lu, Y. H., Jenq, C. C., Chang, Y. J., Chang, Y. C., & Chai, P. Y. C. (2018). Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta‐analysis. Medical education52(9), 910-924.

Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online12(1), 91-115.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri (2. Baskı) (Çev. Edt. M. Bütün ve S. B. Demir). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.

De Wet, J., & Erasmus, Z. (2005). Towards rigour in qualitative analysis. Qualitative Research Journal5(1), 27.

Demiralay, R., ve Karataş, S. (2014). Evde ders okulda ödev modeli. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi3(3), 333-340.

Demirer, V., & Aydın, B. (2017). Ters yüz sınıf modeli çerçevesinde gerçekleştirilmiş çalışmalara bir bakış: içerik analizi. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama7(1), 57-82.

Doğan, T. G. (2015). Sosyal medyanın öğrenme süreçlerinde kullanımı: ters-yüz edilmiş öğrenme yaklaşımına ilişkin öğrenen görüşleri. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi1(2), 24-48.

Du, S. C., Fu, Z. T. & Wang, Y. (2014). The flipped classroom–advantages and challenges. In 2014 International Conference on Economic Management and Trade Cooperation (EMTC 2014). Atlantis Press.

Durak, H. Y. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencileri için ters yüz öğrenme hazırbulunuşluk ölçeğinin türkçeye uyarlanması. Bartin Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi6(3), 1056-1068.

Ekmekçi, E. (2014). Harmanlanmış öğrenme odaklı tersten yapılandırılmış yazma sınıfı modeli. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Elrayies, G. M. (2017). Flipped learning as a paradigm shift in architectural education. International Education Studies10(1), 93-108.

Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends57(6), 14-27.

Erbil, D. G., & Kocabaş, A. (2019). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin eğitimde teknoloji kullanımı, tersine çevrilmiş sınıf ve işbirlikli öğrenme hakkındaki görüşleri. İlköğretim Online18(1), 31-51.

Farah, M. (2014). The impact of using flipped classroom instruction on the writing performance of twelfth grade female Emirati students in the applied technology high school (ATHS) (Doctoral dissertation, The British University in Dubai (BUiD)).

Fulton, K. P. (2012). 10 reasons to flip. Phi Delta Kappan94(2), 20-24.

Gerstein, J. (2011). The flipped classroom model: A full picture. 2012-12-19]. http://usergeneratededucation. wordpress. com/2011/06/13/the-flipped-classroom-model-a-fullpicture.

Girmen, P., & Kaya, M. F. (2019). Using the flipped classroom model in the development of basic language skills and enriching activities: digital stories and games. International Journal of Instruction12(1), 555-572.

Halili, S. H., & Zainuddin, Z. (2015). Flipping the classroom: What we know and what we don’t. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e‐Learning3(1), 28-35.

Hancock, D. R. &Algozzine, B. (2006). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginners researchers. New York: Teachers College.

Hertz, M. B. (2012). The flipped classroom: Pro and con. States News Service, July10(2012), 1-3.

Heyborne, W. H., & Perrett, J. J. (2016). To flip or not to flip? Analysis of a flipped classroom Pedagogy in a general biology course. Journal of College Science Teaching45(4).

Imran, M. (2013). Increasing the interaction time in a lecture by integrating flipped classroom and just-in-time teaching concepts. Journal of learning and teaching, 7, 1–13.

Jamaludin, R., & Osman, S. Z. M. (2014). The use of a flipped classroom to enhance engagement and promote active learning. Journal of education and practice5(2), 124-131.

Kara, C. O. (2015). Ters yüz sınıf. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası15(45).

Kardaş, F., & Yeşilyaprak, B. (2015). Eğitim ve öğretimde güncel bir yaklaşım: teknoloji destekli esnek öğrenme (flipped learning) modeli. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi48(2), 103-122.

Kaya, D., (2018). Matematik öğretiminde ters yüz öğrenme modelinin ortaokul öğrencilerin derse katılımına etkisi. Sakarya University Journal of Education8(4), 232-249.

Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers ve Education78, 160-173.

Koray, A., Çakar, V. & Koray, Ö. (2018). High school students’ opinions about using the flipped classroom ın physics teaching. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology Special Issue for INTE-ITICAM-IDEC Vol.1, 619-624.

Lage, M. J., & Platt, G. (2000). The internet and the inverted classroom. Journal of Economic Education31(1).

Leo, J., & Puzio, K. (2016). Flipped instruction in a high school science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology25(5), 775-781.

Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift, A. W. (2014). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), 317-324.

Mazur, A., Brown, B., & Jacobsen, M. (2015). Learning designs using flipped classroom ınstruction. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 41(2).

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Millard, E. (2012). 5 Reasons why flipped classrooms work. University Business15(11), 26-29.

Nechodomu, T., Falldin, M., & Hoover, S. (2016). CEHD Flipped Learning Guide. https://academics.cehd.umn.edu/digital-education/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/CEHD-DEI-Flipped-Learning-Guide.pdf adresinden 26.08.2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Olakanmi, E. E. (2017). The effects of a flipped classroom model of instruction on students’ performance and attitudes towards chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology26(1), 127-137.

Ozdamli, F., & Asiksoy, G. (2016). Flipped classroom approach. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues8(2), 98-105.

Özdemir, O., (2017). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının yazılı anlatım becerilerinin geliştirilmesinde ters yapılandırılmış öğretim yönteminin etkisi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Gazi Üniversitesi. Ankara.

Pathak, G. (2014). Flipped learning approach for b.ed students: An evaluative study. https://www.academia.edu/34316281/flıpped_learnıng_approach_for_b.ed_students_an_evaluatıve_study adresinden 20.08.2018 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Petty, B. (2018). 4 Tools for a Flipped Classroom. https://www.edutopia.org/article/4-tools-flipped-classroom adresinden 01.10.2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Ramírez, D., Hinojosa, C., & Rodríguez, F. (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of flipped classroom: STEM students perceptions. In 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation ICERI, Seville, Spain (pp. 17-19).

Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family ve Consumer Sciences105(2), 44-49.

Sakar, D., & Uluçınar Sağır, Ş. (2017). Eğitimde ters–yüz çevrilmiş sınıf uygulamaları. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research3(5), 1904-1916.

Schreiber, J. B., & Asner-Self, K. (2011). The interrelationship of questions, sampling, design, and analysis.

Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S. C., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of chemical education91(9), 1334-1339.

Sırakaya, D. A. (2017). Oyunlaştırılmış tersyüz sınıf modeline yönelik öğrenci görüşleri. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi36(1), 114-132.

Smith, J. D. (2013). Student attitudes toward flipping the general chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice14(4), 607-614.

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute.

Stone, B. B. (2012). Flip your classroom to increase active learning and student engagement. In Proceedings from 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching ve Learning, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Şahin, S., & Şahin, Z. (2016). Ters-düz sınıflar (flıpped classroom) ve yeni nesil eğitim dijital öğrenci koçluğu. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports ve Science Education (IJTASE)5(4).

Şencan, H. (2005). Güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik. Hüner Şencan.

Talan, T., & Gülseçen, S. (2018). Ters-yüz sınıf ve harmanlanmış öğrenmede öğrencilerin öz-düzenleme becerilerinin ve öz-yeterlik algılarının incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT)9(3), 563-580.

Talley, C. P., & Scherer, S. (2013). The enhanced flipped classroom: Increasing academic performance with student-recorded lectures and practice testing in a" flipped" STEM course. The Journal of Negro Education82(3), 339-347.

Turan, Z., & Göktaş, Y. (2015). Yükseköğretimde yeni bir yaklaşım: Öğrencilerin ters yüz sınıf yöntemine ilişkin görüşleri. Journal of Higher Education ve Science/Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi5(2).

Uçar, H., & Bozkurt, A. (2018). Dönüştürülmüş sınıf 2.0: Bilginin üretimi ve sentezlenmesi. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi6(3), 143-157.

URL-1: https://edpuzzle.com/login/teacher

Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers ve Education88, 354-369.

Yıldırım, A. (1999). Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinin temel özellikleri ve eğitim araştırmalarındaki yeri ve önemi. Eğitim ve Bilim23(112).

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (6. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yılmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior70, 251-260.

 


Full Text: Full Text PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE)

ISSN: 2146-9466

Creative Commons Licenses

License

All articles published in International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Free counters!

(Counter start: 28.02.2021)